Smikkelbakje/J1B3-Sensor-boxes
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge branch 'main' of ssh://gitlab.fdmci.hva.nl/propedeuse-hbo-ict/onderwijs/2023-2024/out-a-se-ti/blok-3/qaajeeqiinii59

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
sietse jonker
2024-03-26 23:19:16 +01:00
parent 75ff84ee70 a35bd6b88d
commit c0afae2688
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
docs/brainstorm/bebouwBeheer.md
View File

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
# Talk with building management
## Questions for BM
## Questions for building management
1. Design of page? (current page, new design or own idea)
2. What do they expect of a page made for BM?
2. What do they expect of a page made for building management?
3. Do they think they can work with the incomming feedback from the enquete?
4. Design of the node? (plastic or wood)
## Feedback:
BM had some good feedback points about the page it self, about the idea and some good pointers for the execution. They would also look into making the data they are already messuring acceseble for us. The things they had to say about the website is: they found the first design a bit unorgenised and said that would rather see the second design with were you can select the node you want to see, mayby also a search function to specify the node that is displayed. What also was said was to try to make it idiot proof becouse not all of the BM people are technicly active to put it that way. They had some things to say about the node design, like mayby make the collor white to make it better with blending into the white walls of the total aryea. Thay also asked the question of does it matter at what hight the node is placed. One other thing they said was to write something onto the node to make it clear to the people in the area what it was doeing something like ReaderNode^tm^. And the last thing they said was if we thought about how to make it fandelising sudents proof
building management had some good feedback points about the page itself, about the idea, and some good pointers for the execution. They would also look into making the data they are already measuring accessible for us. The things they had to say about the website are: they found the first design a bit unorganized and said that they would rather see the second design where you can select the node you want to see, maybe also a search function to specify the node that is displayed. What also was said was to try to make it idiot-proof because not all of the building management people are technically active, to put it that way. They had some things to say about the node design, like maybe make the color white to make it better with blending into the white walls of the total area. They also asked the question of does it matter at what height the node is placed. One other thing they said was to write something onto the node to make it clear to the people in the area what it was doing, something like ReaderNode™. And the last thing they said was if we thought about how to make it vandalizing students proof.