geboubeheer gesprec documentation

docs/brainstorm/bebouwBeheer.md

@@ -9,17 +9,4 @@
 
 ## Feedback:
 
-BM had some good feedback points about the page it self, about the idea and some good pointers for the execution. They would also look into making the data they are already messuring acceseble for us. The things they had to say about the website is: they found the first design a bit unorgenised and said that they had 
-Sietse design
-te klein scherm eigenlijk (1)
-naamgeving
-zoekfunctie?
-opvragen en filteren (idiot proof)
-wit zodat niet opvallen
-opschreiven wat het doet
-hoogtes?
-
-
-
-
-2x in database
+BM had some good feedback points about the page it self, about the idea and some good pointers for the execution. They would also look into making the data they are already messuring acceseble for us. The things they had to say about the website is: they found the first design a bit unorgenised and said that would rather see the second design with were you can select the node you want to see, mayby also a search function to specify the node that is displayed. What also was said was to try to make it idiot proof becouse not all of the BM people are technicly active to put it that way. They had some things to say about the node design, like mayby make the collor white to make it better with blending into the white walls of the total aryea. Thay also asked the question of does it matter at what hight the node is placed. One other thing they said was to write something onto the node to make it clear to the people in the area what it was doeing something like ReaderNode^tm^. And the last thing they said was if we thought about how to make it fandelising sudents proof